Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Bllog #24Who is Watson right?

As much as you may love something, there will always be limits, logic and people that love other things more than you love your own "something". Watson's passion for whales does not give him the right to attack people that has other passions different to his, like "whale commerce" perhaps, or maybe I should call it money.

Not that what they are doing is right, is not the fact that they have or not have the right to kill whales, but they certainly have the right to pursue what they want.
And if they are doing something against the law to get it, it is certainly not Watson's responsibility to punish them. Why concentrate in whales when there's a million cows being killed everyday. Unless Watson is a vegetarian he doesn't have the right to say anything about people making money of meet. because after all what's the difference between wet meet and dry meet. So if the question is Who is right? My answer would be neither of them. Not Watson not the killers. Being passionate about something and fighting for it does not make you right or wrong.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

About Arana's article...


"Isn't it time for the language to move on?" How do you feel about this? Why?

I feel very connected to what she says when she talks about the Hispanic population, because I'm part of it. I've heard the words "cholo", "pocho", and many other labels that people give to Mexicans that live here in the states, since I came to live here. Even if they where born here, that brownish color on their skin, and the not very good accent that we have, because most of the Hispanic people speak two languages, puts us in that kind of situations.


And In fact, how Arana says "Even they label themselves by the apparent color of their skin". The truth is we call ourselves those names, so clearly the mind change about racism has to come from the bottom, from the "affected" people. We can't blame the people that label us, for calling other people "black", "Chicano", because we accept it and we live with it. What we can blame them for is for labeling the United States as a "post-racial society".

When people talk about America they referee to it as a free country or a country with freedom of speech, But they don't know that there are schools in this country where if you speak Spanish, you go straight to detention.

The racism in America changed yes, before Martin Luther King and some other people that helped to "kill" racism, it was open to the eyes of the world. Now is quite because maybe is not "cool" to make a racist joke maybe. But it's still there, because if we don't change our mind on how we think about other cultures, NOTHING is going to change it. I think that is a personal decision that everyone makes, and has to go through. Either you accept variety, not necessarily like it, or you hate it and live with it, because bi-racial population will keep growing.

Thursday, November 20, 2008

ThAnKsGiViNg Break!!

I'm thankful for knowing God, for my grandma, mom and sister, (my entire family).
For the Sheahan's, The Mason's, the Olson's, for my friends! Aubrey, Noel, Sukey, Mickey, (all of them) , I also thankful for my brothers, they're cool. And finaly I'm thankful for being a live and with lots of love.
ps: I kinda like this scjool too, so i should be thankful for this to, ha.

What I have to get done during this brake is:
- sense I divided my article in 5 parts, and I have to do a draft for each one,
I need to write the three drafts that i'm mising.
-pollution draft.
-PB point draft.
-pollution in PB point
- surfers in PB point.

- I need to go to PB point and take pictures of that beach.
- need to write for each picture a description.

Friday, November 7, 2008

Honors blog (KiNda)


Reflection on "Redeeming Love" by Francine Rivers.


I like to always be reading something. But usually if a book is not interesting I stop reading it.The book that I’m currently reading,(and that I’m almost done with) is called “Redeeming Love”.
By the title you can tell that it is a romantic novel. But this novel is different because it is not about how the two main characters can’t make their life together because another persons interfere, It is about them fighting against themselves to learn how to love each other..





The author, Francine Rivers, does a good job explaining every detail, which helped me to stay interested. She does get you to the point where you start to feel desperate because their relationship doesn’t move, but she the author always finds a way to give you hope and inspire you to keep reading the book.



Characterization: When the author talks about the main characters she gets so into detail. She describes every feeling that they have and every movement they make, even what they’re wearing. All of their physical attributes are well given. She gives you more than enough information to picture them. Rivers, describes Angel (protagonist) as a beautiful girl, with blond hair, blue eyes, smart, with no hope, strong character, she also describes her as a revengeful person, and she gives a lot other details about her. Since “Angel” was a prostitute, and her life was full of hard things, I got a very passionate idea of reading about her, and of reading how her personality changes over time, of course this change comes because of Michael's love. About Michael, Rivers does a good job also describing him. Deep voice, dark hair, tall, blue ayes, wonderful smile and a good heart. Every figure in the story is described in a way that you can identify your self with them and that you can see both sides of their character, good and bad. Their virtues and their weakness, is all there.


Conflict:
Like in every story, there is conflict. In this novel the conflict is based in Angel’s life. It all starts when she was eight and her mom died. She was taken by a man that put her into prostitution. After a few years of trying to escape she gives up and losses any hope that she had. When she finally has the opportunity to make a new life with Michael the true conflict begins.
Because she abruptly changes her life, she doesn’t know how to handle it. So the true fight is with herself. There’s a little voice saying “let him be happy” and then the other one saying “he loves you, stay with him”. There’s always an internal fight. And an exterior too, with people around Michael that don’t see Angel as his wife. Obviously their lives are so different, that it takes a long process to get over it.

Tragedy:
All of the conflict can end up being a moral lesson, or simply tragedy. This story is a complete tragedy except for perhaps the last seven chapters.
The tragedy in this story is fundamental. The whole novel is surrounded by sadness, and things that changed Angel’s life. The author takes you to the deep thoughts of the girl, but it also shows you the big picture, by telling you what’s going wrong. Tragedy takes Angel by the hand. It makes the story more dramatic and more logical to the way she reacts later. What I mean by saying tragedy is, that every decision that Angel made, like all decisions had consequences, but with the ones she made, you never can expect to get something good out of it. She would receive bad or worst.

Blog #20, I could do something good out of this!

#1

One of my final products will be an article. my article will be based in different interviews that my partner and I will complete. What I like about this article is that they include in a proper way the cutes from the interview, they make them sound interesting and they get the important parts. The author of the article also makes it sound more general, like if all of the surfers thought that way. I don't know if that's right but it helps him get to his point.

Trick Or Treat
Crash The Coast Concludes On All Hallows Eve
by Zach Weisberg

The luminous jackolantern grins at me. He’s thinking what I’m thinking:

“I can’t believe we just pulled this off.”

It’s fitting too – the way SURFER’s Crash The Coast Trip has concluded, because Halloween marks a transition period into the cold with an eerie celeb

ration - and in our case where the surf culture skips along as a mystery.

The surfers in New Hampshire warned us about Maine. They said, “This is kind of the end of the rainbow here. Once you start heading north the surfers become few and far between. It goes from ten miles between exits to twenty miles between exits.”

Ross Kunkel, Cinnamon Rainbows Employee said, “Those guys will come down from North Maine and grab a new board and wetsuit and we won’t see them again for another year.”

We had to get to the bottom of this.


We didn’t make it to that sketchy part of Maine they were talking about, but we did find a committed crew of surfers to show us around the area surrounding Higgins Beach and Portland.

“I think the strangeness is based around the fact that it’s incredibly empty,” says Northeast Firewire Rep, Chris Cary. “A lot of it has to do with the fact that the surf community in New Hampshire is so tight-knit that the further north you go in Maine the stranger the people are because you might run into a surfer up north who’s never s

urfed with more than three people.”

Sounds like a dream. But what I think might be the weirdest thing about Maine surfers is their authenticity. It’s refreshingly jarring, and exactly what our seafaring tribe needs.

“I like it here in the sense that you don’t get a lot of egos,” says Carey. “You can go out anywhere pretty much and feel comfortable…You might not be able to pick a surfer out of a crowd here, because surfers here don’t really care about the gear – they just want to surf.”

It’s like we had found what we were searching for. Nevermind the lack of industry - only once we got as far from a conventional surf town as we could imagin

e, did we really find one. Considering it was a freezing Halloween night, and the candy was spilling from the doorsteps – we had nothing left to do but celebrate.

There was only one costume to do it in, too: Dumb and Dumber's Harry and Lloyd. After all, we scrounged from Latino South Beach, FL to the blistering cold of Portland, Maine, and got lost fifty times along the way.

But according to this map, we only went six inches.

dumb and dumber surfer

Thanks to all of our gracious hosts and sponsors, and people who kept u

p with our journey along the way, We trekked for 17 days without spending a dime on a hotel room. East Coast surfers dropped everything at a moment’s notice and welcomed us into their homes and told us their stories. For that we are grateful.

Look for the full feature in an upcoming issue of SURFER Magazine, and something tells me we’ll be back here soon.

Link to the article here!

#2 (PiCtUrEs!!)

The second part of my final product will be two or three pictures that I will take in our many visits to the beach.
-What I like of this picture is that it gives an idea of how dirty the water can be and we still don't do anything about it, we just live with it. And what a want to do in one of my pictures is to promote this. People thinking about how real the polluted water is in our environment. So basically what I like about this picture is the message that it has.

- In this picture you can see a clean beach, and want to project the idea of what we want too. And of course I will include surfers in at least one of my pictures, and they are probably will be in the water not just walking. But the sky, the sand and the clean water look so good together



- I also want to show to how bad the diseases that you can get in polluted water are.

Blog #19

The U.S census Bureau, reveals that “Hispanics constituted 14 percent of the nation’s total population.” The Latino vote was also very important in this election. According to “The Dallas morning news”, When it comes to voting, the Latinos put as their top priority the candidate that has better ideals in Economy. This is very important to them. What could be a reason for this way of thinking, is that the majority of the Latino people in the U.S come to this country to make their “American dream” come true. Which in another words would be, look for better opportunities of getting a job and making money. So obviously that’s what they base their vote on. With Obama's proposition of reducing taxes and helping middle class people, it was obvious to see a positive reaction in the Latino population. Also in my very personal opinion an being part of the Latino community, I think that the fact of Obama not being white gives him more votes from the Latinos, because we like that. Now it can be prove that to become president of the United States you only need a birth certificate, and blue eyes are not required.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Plan for my H2o project...


For My beach project my final product will be an Article, based in this question; how do pollution affect surfers/ swimmers and residents on a couple beaches, I still don’t know which ones, but I will get to that point. What I do know is that it will be more than two beaches. My article will be presented as a web page and it will content a video produced by Sophie Santiago. We will both work together on the interviews and research.
I should say that I will take a couple of pictures based on what we have learned in class, and we will add them to the web page.

The resources that we will need to accomplish this are:
- Interviews to a few Doctors working close to the area s to the beaches
me and my partner will research in.
- Interviews to surfers.
- Video camera for the video.
- Camera for the pictures.

The people that I will need, (mostly for interviews):
Doctors that live close to the area.
surfers.
residents.



The schedule will work like this:

Wednesday 12:
Thursday 13:
Friday 14:
Monday 17:
Tuesday 18:
Wednesday 19:
Thursday 20:
Friday 21:

The weekends will be use to work on the structure of the article, and of course rest.

Question’s Doctors.
What type of diseases is more common of people that spend more time than a normal person (like surfers or residents) at the beach?
1-What type of bacteria is more common to see in diseases that we can get in polluted water?
2-What causes these bacteria? (What human actions?)
3- Are there ways for people to prevent these diseases?
4- How bad or extreme can a disease get?
5-would you swim in that water?
6- In average how many surfers come in a month to see you because they got an infection in the water?
7- Is there any solution you would propose to stop the water from contaminating?

Question’s Surfers.
1- How often do you get diseases from spending so much time in this water?
2- Are you well informed of how contaminated this beach is?
3- Does it bother you that the beach is this polluted?
4- Have you done something about it?
5- Are you well informed of what you can do to help your beach?
6- How much money do you spend on doctors or medicine everytime you get sick?
7- Do you think the government should do something about this or is it the People’s responsibilities?

If you want to see more questions you can go to my partner’s blog, Sophie Santiago.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

ReFleCtiOn "Election"

How do I feel about the election?


Obama won!!. I probably heard that about 623 times this day.I think we all saw what was coming since the first debate. Even though it was a tight fight between the candidates, it was really clear that America was going to choose the new and refresh idea of a government, and obviously Obama was giving that. I feel that it was a fear fight. And Obama deserves a chance to display he's ideas.







What are my hopes for America and your community in the next few years?



My hope for the US, is that it gets over the financial crisis that they are going trough right now , and that it will be the same country that it was maybe a year ago, powerful and successful. And after America goes back to normal, our communities will do it as well.


What are my concerns for America and your community for the next few years?







The only thing that really scares me is the idea of America being a liberalise country, maybe this is a really extremist way to say it. But men's kissing each other and killing babies, doesn't sound very natural to me. Other than that, every thing sounds OK.

Obama on abortion.

........................................................................................
My understanding on civic knowlege...
I could say that for being a new person to this country, the knowlege that i have is good. But for being a student in High Tech High it could probably be better. But the truth is, the blog and the posts that we have to do every tuesday and thursday have help me so much. I'm learning to relate history with current events. which is exacly what I need right now. I combination of both to get to know better the sistem of the United States. I woudnt change anything to this class. The one thing I would change is the way I'm taking avenage of it. I could learn so much more if I work more.
When we have our history-current news talks in class, I learn a lot!! what i don't like is that I never have anything interesting to say.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Blog #17

How does pollution affect humans?
Lets first start knowing what Pollution is. According to wikipedia pollution is "the introduction of contaminants into an environment that causes instability, disorder, harm or discomfort to the physical systems or living organisms they are in." I would basically call it contamination.

But there's another ways to describe it. Web definitions for pollution.

So how does it affect humans?
You can get so many diseases because of water pollution, because this is usually caused by our house drains or contamination from factories.

Humans Health
Effects of water pollution in humans and animals
youtube video of water pollution effects.

more effects in humans!




Article about reducing and controlling in California.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

The ACORN scandal vs. the potential for vote-suppression.


The the Association of Community Organizations for Reform. ACORN is an association that works in several social issues. one of them is the voter registration. Obviously it is not the only one that exists. But this one is now well known by everyone after McCain mentioned in he's debate that they were doing one of the biggest "frauds in voter history".
He said this because the ACORN has been submitting false or fake voter registration. what he didn't say is that, that's the ACORN's job. It is illegal for them to not turn in forms,even if they think is fake. It's not their responsibility to take care of these things. the election officials should be taking care of this. Another bad reason for McCain to say this is that is really hard for people that turn in fake registrations to actually vote. According to The nation's article,"If current polls and trends remain, it'll be extremely difficult for any possible fraud to affect the outcome of the presidential race". So basically this issue doesn't really make any effect on the coming elections.




Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Blog #15 Debates in their historical context


The Presidential debates initiated on October 2nd. sense that day they've been a really important thing for American society to talk about. And even though everyone has a different opinion there's things that were clear, and no mater who wins, they become facts.


McCain and Obama. About the first debate most of the people said it was a tight. The fact is at least in the first debate Barack Obama was much more confident.
McCain keap talking about the 800 billion dollars Obama wants, and how much the democratic is going to increase taxes. And Obama keap on talking about deregulation.



On their second debate in October 7Th. Obama was going over the same things, like the plan he has to make economy better. McCain was saying how his going to "fix the US problems." They were pointing stuff to each other like the votes they made in the pass in congress. Obama said a few things about Bush. He explain how the US now owes more money to other countries because of Bush. so even though there was a lot of fighting, it wasn't that great. News say Obama won the second debate.




In their third and last debate I think everyone expected a little bit more. Obama for the third time went over he's plan to help America and of course, McCain still thinks that he can save the world by saying that he will fix things. The truth is, for me watching this debate was like watching the first or the second debate nothing different or new, well except for "Joe the plumer" I can't finish this post with out mentioning the guy that become famous for being mentioned over 23 times in the third debate. This three debates were definitely important to get to know better the candidates and to see them from another and more direct point of view. After all one of this to will take the US by the hand to it's future.


And if they don't do it the vice presidents will do it, that's for sure. so let's talk a little about what the substitutes said in their In the first and only vice presidential debate.


Sarah Palin and Joe Biden. She keap talking to the audience, and talking like if she was a middle class person. which I think people tend to like with out noticing. Badin did a great job but he was using Obama's words for everything. I don't know if that's the best thing. He tried to make his points by fighting and talking about them but Palin wouldn't let him because she wouldn't answer or she would start talking about something else. Actually she did that most of the time. When a question was made she would give her best answers to a whole different question.
I think that she has a lot of things against her, beginning with being a women, second having a pregnant daugther and third she only had one debate, one opportunity and she ruin it. But everyone sees things how ever they want to so I guess you can start a good one out of the debates.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Blog #14 How has the Internet affected the way that Americans approach democracy?


I think that Internet has a lot to do with democracy, because if you search for anything in the Internet, there will always be two sides for everything, good and bad, bad and good, so you never know. The point is everyone can give their point of view. That's democracy it's all about what every single person things. So I can write what ever I want, and let the world know trough the Internet. So yes it has affected the world.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Reflection "NeWsPaPeR"

This project was interesting because we learned to use another ways of writing, It was not about just sitting and writing whatever came to our heads, we had to actually write facts.
Our team had to do the front page of a newspaper, and pretend that it was 1858 on a September 18th, which means that the fourth debate between Lincoln and Douglas was going on in Charleston.

To make this happen we tried to make a good use of our time.
We divided the team in four segments. The Douglas article, the Lincoln’s article, the summary of the whole debate and finally the editor, and guy that would actually put all the pieces together. Will wrote the Douglas article, Wyatt did the summary, Jacob was the editor.

My job was to write Lincoln’s article. So what I did is I read the speech that he gave in the fourth debate and I also read a little of “Face the nation”, that was really helpful. It was really interesting to write the facts with out comments of my own, or with out relating it to the current events. I was getting use to that after a while of writing stuff with a personal touch, or relating it to what’s happening today in America.
It’s cool to different things and get out of the box, the truth is, I couldn’t wait to see our newspaper printed out.

After everything was all put together it seemed to look really good. Once we got it printed, the story changed. Besides the editor having some mistakes, (like putting a line between the writing), we had a lot of open space. I think we could of fill that with some fakes news, or “commercials”.

In my writing I noticed that I could of write more, and maybe write another article, I think that I had the idea that because it was in a newspaper I had to be quick and informative but ones is printed you kind of want to see more. At least I know what to do next time I have to write for a news paper.

I seriously can’t imagine how the big newspaper industries work, if they make a newspaper per day! We had a week and had a bunch of mistakes. Well, we had some good things too.
Overall the writing was pretty good and it had perfect spelling, I know that’s how it should be, but some teams didn’t, so I suppose that has to be good. I am proud of how we decided to take the whole idea into 1854, and we kind of did everything how we thought they would do it. For example we didn’t use colored pictures in our newspaper, that makes it look so good.

Well I can say I am really happy to be in the same team with this guys, they really took care of everything, it was so good to have someone reading what I wrote and telling me what I could improve. We explored different ways to write and that’s fun, but I still like writing what I think better.

My FaVooRiTee PicSs......

I like this picture because it has the cutest baby in the world in it. And I know him, his my brother. I don't know who took this picture, but I am guessing it was mom because it's eye level, and moms love doing that. I am not sure if it applies to the rule of thirds, but it's a great picture.

















I obviously love this picture because it has the Mexican flag in it, and because it was taking in Ensenada. But the view is excellent and the background (sky) is so beautiful.

















I just love this picture, I know is nothing like rule of thirds, but the use of the light is really interesting, it's bright in the back and it gets darker in the front, I Think that's the main point of the picture, not Ellen and Nat. (they are cute too.) but the front and background are wonderful.












In this picture the depth of field is good, and the picture is really colorful. And if you like Mexican folklor like i do, you'll like this pic.






This picture has the rule of thirds, you can see it in their kiss. the background is beautiful and is eye level even though is kind of far.

















I like the use of the light (sunrise) in this picture, and the truth is I google up "best picture in the world" and this is what came up.















In this one the day light is perfect, it is eye level, and the background is beutiful.


This picture is eyed level, and realistic, because if you were really looking at her, you would see blurry the part in the back.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Demographic what?! ohhh

Blog #11


The next article I think is a great example of what the impact of demographic areas will impact on the elections, It's about the latino voters in some states in the US, and their impact.




LOS ANGELES, Oct 07, 2008
Poll of Registered Latinos in Colorado, Florida, New Mexico and Nevada Suggests High Turnout; the Economy, and Candidate Support for Community Will Drive Election Outcomes

A significant percentage of Latino voters in key battleground states are either undecided or still open to persuasion in the presidential contest, according to a survey released today by The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund.

The survey of registered Latinos in Colorado, Florida, New Mexico and Nevada also demonstrates that Latino voters may turn out in unprecedented numbers and that the economy is their top election priority. Nearly a third of respondents said they had trouble making their mortgage or rent payments at some point during the past 12 months.
Issues such as the war in Iraq, health care and immigration reform are also at the top of voters' minds. Nearly a third believes there is no difference between the Republican and Democratic parties in their concern for Latinos.


"As the electoral map takes shape, it's increasingly clear the Latino vote may be decisive," said Arturo Vargas, Executive Director of the NALEO Educational Fund. "In key battleground states, Latino voters are ready to vote in huge numbers, and a significant percentage is still persuadable. Underestimating the Latino vote could be disastrous for either party," concluded Vargas.




Monday, October 6, 2008

Debates: then and now.







The debates between Lincoln and Douglas were certainly a lot more different that what the debates are now a days. They had 7 debates in 7 different places. Each debate was three hours long!! The first person stared talking for an hour. The next one had a half an hour. And then the first speaker would finish with a half an hour.




The debates started on 1858. Everyone thought that Douglas would win the debates, not Lincoln. Only a few trusted him, but not even his supporters really did. The first one in Ottawa, The second one was in Freeport. In this one Lincoln started making his point and using strategies, He was against popular sovereignty and he was going to convince the people. Lincoln was against slavery and he was trying to prove that Douglas wasn't. In fact in the third debate at Jonesboro Douglas declared: "I hold that this government was made in the white basis, by white man for the benefit of white man and their prosperity forever, and should be administered by white man and none others". Think about it, If this country had his mentality Obama would not be running for president of the US right now.




The fourth debate was at Charleston, Three days later. In this one Lincoln said: "I'm not nor even have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes". He was saying that he was not interesting or looking toward to letting the Africans be on politics or anything, like Douglas said in the last debate. In Charleston people started noticing that Lincoln was winning power over the word war. In number five the number of crowd went up to 25,000 people. This one was at Galesburg in October 7Th. In this one Lincoln attach and said that the real difference between Douglas and the republicans was that the judge Douglas was that He didn't wanted to make any difference between slavery and liberty. In this fight Lincoln won in all points. In the next one at Quincy he came up with the same argument and won again. By the seventh and last one Douglas was week and his words were meaningless, so I'm guessing that was really easy for Lincoln, He would just have to go over the basic immorality of slavery and that was it.





And he did it but even though he won the debates he didn't win the elections what it doesn't really make sense for me. But two years later he won the presidential nomination.




OK now lets go a few years to the future.It's not Lincoln and Douglas. Is McCain and Obama. About this debate most of the people said it was a tight. I say Obama won. why? He was so relaxed about it and confident. now that doesn't mean that McCain did a bad job, H was just kind of boring. But hey, that's OK that's what politicians do right? they talk like that.




McCain keap talking about the 800 billion dollars Obama wants and how much he is going to increse taxes. And Obama keap on talking about dergulation.








On their second debate in october 7Th. Obama was going over the same things, like the plan he has to make economy better. McCain was saying how his going to "fix the US problems." They were pointing stuff to each other like the votes they made in the pass in congress. Obama said a few things about Bush. He explain how the US now ows more money to other countrys because of Bush. so even though there was a lot of fighting, it wasn't that great. News say Obama won the second debate.




In the first and only vicepresidential debate Palin vs Badin, She was really confident and she keap talking to the audience, and talking like if she was a midle class person. which I think people tend to like with out noticing.Badin did a great job but he was using Obamas words for everything. I don't know if that's the best thing. He tried to make his points by fighting and talking about them but Palin wouldn't let him because she woudn't answer or she would start talking about something else. It was propably a tight.





Funny video... Obama vs McCain.




Monday, September 29, 2008

The Ku Klux Klan started after and because of the civil war.

“Slavery ended a long time ago. Blacks have it much better today. Why can’t they just get over it?” .-
There’s an never ending list of Americans that still think this way. I was reading my friend's post today, and it said that racism has been going on for 300 years now!
The truth is racism is still very present in the US.

And a way to prove this, is the KKK still exists. African-Americans, Jews and Catholics are only some of the groups
tormented by these white supremacists.
So let me tell you a little part of the Ku Klux Klan story.



As we all know the US Civil War was a conflict between the Northern and the Southern states. The states in the South (Confederates) wanted to be independent because they wanted to keep slavery going on in their own country. But the ones in the North (Union) besides being against slavery, wanted to keep just one country. The North won. Not long after this happened, in 1866 a group of ex- Confederates, the majority being democratic and extremely racist, created a association called the Ku Klux Klan.


It was made to keep White Americans in the government and prevent the African Americans from revolting. The Klan resisted Reconstruction by intimidating the new free man.

They started by scaring them with their particular masks and white robes. But it didn’t take them too long to use violent methods. They started killing a lot of people. By doing this they were killing the hopes and dreams of liberty of the free surviving African-American man. That sense of Privacy that America had was not made for them as long as the crosses kept burning every day.


Fifty three years passed and Mrs. Till couldn't forget That her son Emmett Till was murder just because he tried to make the rights for African American people real. He was murdered by the KKK. And she had to live with that. Do you really think that's living?


KKK started growing more and more, the terrible fact is we are now in 2008 and they still keep forming new groups. Maybe not killing people as much as they used to, but the fear is still there.The KKK lives to say that racism in America is still going on. And getting worst.

















You have to watch this!!


link here Till's mother talking.


Here are some link's to the history of the KKK.


Easy to read KKK history


Obama and the KKK
Burning a cross

The second Klan

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Fletcher vs. Peck


In 1795, the Georgia legislature sold thirty-five million acres of Native American land to four land speculating companies for one-half million dollars. The state sold the land to some Developers. John Peck bought some of the land from him.


He coudn't finish paying so He sold it to Robert Fletcher.


When Fletcher find out He brought suit against Peck, claiming that he did not have clear title to the land when he sold it. The case reached the Supreme Court, which in a unanimous decision ruled that the state legislature's repeal of the law was unconstitutional.




A year later the people elected new legislature people. The state of Georgia dicided that the legislature made a bad decicion a year before and that they should have the land back, and maybe give it back to the native american. So they want it the land.
But the Supreme court overruled the state and said they were wrong and because of the property right's and Ex Post Facto the land owner was fletcher.

It was the first case in which the Supreme Court ruled a state law unconstitutional.

..........................................................................................
This are some links to get more details.
wikipedia



This is an article I find interesting and easy to read.(but still mine is better.)


Fletcher v. Peck


US Supreme Court decision of 1810 dealing with the right of states to impair contracts. A complaint was filed against the Georgia state legislature, which had revoked land claims of settlers who had bought land from fraudulent land companies that had been granted the land by the corrupt legislature. In the Yazoo Land Fraud the Court ruled that the judiciary could not judge the motives of the state legislature and that Georgia could not pass a law impairing what was therefore a valid contract.

This article is © Research Machines plc 2004. All rights reserved. Helicon Publishing is a division of Research Machines plc.








Tuesday, September 23, 2008

After blogging comes the journling....

Reflection


Before I start answering the questions, I will say that this has been a very interesting project. We are all learning a lot. so two things are for sure. By the end of the year I will probably be really good posting, and I will be sick tired of it too. But for now is good. I don't have nothing to be proud of because what I did anyone could of done it. And I could of done it better. so I'm going to answer the next three.


What would i improve during future blogs?

I would say that my blog wasn't that interesting at all. It was just normal. It had a few pictures (one with me in it :) but nothing more than that. for example my post "Bank of America takes Marill Lynch" didn't have a single picture. Well that has to change, my future posts will have more videos, pictures, games and colors.
And even though I think my opinions are kind of be cool, they were to short. So next time they will be longer and easier to read. In fact instead of using "copy-paste" I will just write about the article and insert the link to it.


How can we better connect our blogs?

I think that we should have everyone Else's blog on a list. On our own blog. that way it would be easier to see other blogs. Other idea would be to make a post about someone Else's blog. And maybe it would be good if we had to comment too.

It would be good if the blogging about other persons was assigned by Randy or the project managers. That way every one would have a comment on their blog.


How has blogging impacted my understanding of..


The US? I just move from another country, Mexico. So if three weeks ago you came and ask me who Obama was, I would have no clue. Before I came to this country I knew I would learn a lot about the US government and culture, but blogging help me so much. I learn new and old stuff about this place.

The media? I learn a lot about all the different tools that we can use to make something more interesting and eye catching. I love when I see that kind of stuff on blogs. Now, that doesn't mean that I like doing it, it takes so much for me. I think that's the reason why i didn't have much media stuff on my blog. But I have to start doing it. They look so much better with it.
And you learn so much about it ,that you can use it on other things, things that you actually like, for example myspace.

Current events? Lets just say that before this I wasn't interested on the news at all. I thought they were boring and a lot of the times sad, I simply did not like them. That change. now I see it a little bit different. News and current events can be interesting and necessary. How did I discover this? well during this 3 weeks of blogging we would look for all types of news and articles. Not only the boring ones that we see on TV. So you get to explore what's going on with the world in a interesting way.

And "old news"? About old news it can be so interesting how you can actually relate them to the current ones, and they make sense. And we discover that People doesn't change at all, they just change the names.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Barbies can be seen as terrorists!!







In Iran, Barbie seen as cultural invader
By Scott Peterson Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
from the September 15, 2008 edition

Reporter Scott Peterson discusses symbols used in Iranian politics, going back to the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
TEHRAN, Iran - According to Iran's judiciary, the most dangerous items in a Tehran toy shop are not the lifelike pistols and sub-machine guns in the display case. The authorities have instead singled out the hot-pink boxes showcasing Barbie dolls as the real portents of a Western "cultural invasion."
Illegally imported Barbie dolls are "destructive culturally and a social danger," Iranian prosecutor Ghorban Ali Dori Najafabadi warned in a letter last April. Barbie, Batman, Spiderman, and Harry Potter toys, he wrote, are a "danger that needs to be stopped." He added: "Undoubtedly, the personality and identity of the new generation and our children, as a result of unrestricted importation of toys, has been put at risk and caused irreparable damage."
The curvaceous and often scantily clad Barbie dolls with peroxide-blond hair and a suggestion of unbridled Western fun are seen here as a direct challenge to the conservative and religious sensibilities officials hope to encourage. But a decade-long, anti-Barbie campaign waged by hard-liners has met with little success.
Toy sellers have yet to hear about new rules limiting the sale of Barbie, once famously labeled a "Trojan Horse with many cultural invading soldiers inside it."
"We never heard an official statement" against selling the dolls, says the owner of a toy shop in downtown Tehran, where the Fashion Fever Barbie and Barbie Glamour Pup are squeezed between Westernized knockoffs such as the Juicy Bling doll and Action Man. "Those kids who watch foreign television and [illegal] satellite want Barbie dolls," says the shop owner, who asked not to be named.
But of the three to four dolls he sells per day, only one or two a week are Barbies. Even 15 years ago, the shop owner found that a shipping container-worth of imported Barbie paraphernalia sold more slowly than he had hoped. But he says that has more to do with a small market and competition from other Western dolls than the government crackdown.
Official efforts to create an Iranian version called Sara also failed to stem Barbie's popularity. First slated for roll out in 1999 for the 20th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, dolls of Sara and her brother Dara were delayed for lack of "suitable hair," officials told the Monitor at the time. But the first prototypes made in Iran reportedly did not appeal to children, and the job was then contracted to China, where Barbie dolls are also made.
The first Sara and Dara dolls were launched in spring 2002, when a crackdown on Barbie led one north Tehran shop owner to tell the London daily The Guardian that a morality police squad had confiscated $11,000 worth of Barbie merchandise and detained him for three days.
At the time of its release, Sara was one of the first attempts at marketing a Muslim doll. In 2003, Syrian designers introduced Fulla, a dark-eyed doll with "Muslim values," which met with some success. Within two years, 1.5 million Fulla dolls had been sold across the Middle East. A Michigan-based company also launched a veiled doll called Razanne in 2003, geared towards Muslims in the United States and Britain. Last year, Salma dolls in headscarves and ankle-length dresses were launched in Indonesia.


But during a recent visit to a downtown Tehran toy shop, there were no Sara and Dara dolls on the shelf because they simply don't sell. "They are very heavy and stiff – [there's] a baby character and a big doll and they are twice the price," explains the shop owner.
Iranians "who have seen Sara and Dara advertisements abroad come and buy them because they are 'traditional,'" he says. "But kids who live here, they never ask for it." Sara and Dara "are a good idea, if they can make something similar to these [Barbies] with a chador or headscarf. Kids might say 'this looks cool' and buy it," adds the owner. "As a toy seller, I would prefer these all to be locally produced ... [but] you can't compare. They are different dolls."

Monday, September 15, 2008

Obamas's birth certificate

Some claim that Obama posted a fake birth certificate to his Web page. That charge leaped from the blogosphere to the mainstream media earlier this week when Jerome Corsi, author of a book attacking Obama, repeated the claim in an Aug. 15 interview with Steve Doocy on Fox News.
The Obama birth certificate, held by FactCheck writer Joe Miller

Corsi: Well, what would be really helpful is if Senator Obama would release primary documents like his birth certificate. The campaign has a false, fake birth certificate posted on their website. How is anybody supposed to really piece together his life?

Doocy: What do you mean they have a "false birth certificate" on their Web site?

Corsi: The original birth certificate of Obama has never been released, and the campaign refuses to release it.

Doocy: Well, couldn't it just be a State of Hawaii-produced duplicate?

Corsi: No, it's a -- there's been good analysis of it on the Internet, and it's been shown to have watermarks from Photoshop. It's a fake document that's on the Web site right now, and the original birth certificate the campaign refuses to produce.

Corsi isn't the only skeptic claiming that the document is a forgery. Among the most frequent objections we saw on forums, blogs and e-mails are:
  • The birth certificate doesn't have a raised seal.
  • It isn't signed.
  • No creases from folding are evident in the scanned version.
  • In the zoomed-in view, there's a strange halo around the letters.
  • The certificate number is blacked out.
  • The date bleeding through from the back seems to say "2007," but the document wasn't released until 2008.
  • The document is a "certification of birth," not a "certificate of birth."
Recently FactCheck representatives got a chance to spend some time with the birth certificate, and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago. We can assure readers that the certificate does bear a raised seal, and that it's stamped on the back by Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka (who uses a signature stamp rather than signing individual birth certificates). We even brought home a few photographs.





Alvin T. Onaka's signature stamp


The raised seal


Blowup of text

You can click on the photos to get full-size versions, which haven't been edited in any way, except that some have been rotated 90 degrees for viewing purposes.

The certificate has all the elements the State Department requires for proving citizenship to obtain a U.S. passport: "
your full name, the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such records." The names, date and place of birth, and filing date are all evident on the scanned version, and you can see the seal above.

The document is a "certification of birth," also known as a short-form birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes additional information such as birth weight and parents' hometowns. The short form is printed by the state and draws from a database with fewer details. The Hawaii Department of Health's birth record request form does not give the option to request a photocopy of your long-form birth certificate, but their short form has enough information to be acceptable to the State Department. We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer the short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response.

The scan released by the campaign shows halos around the black text, making it look (to some) as though the text might have been pasted on top of an image of security paper. But the document itself has no such halos, nor do the close-up photos we took of it. We conclude that the halo seen in the image produced by the campaign is a digital artifact from the scanning process.


We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that's when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that document and "all the records we could get our hands on" according to spokesperson Shauna Daly. The campaign didn't release its copy until 2008, after speculation began to appear on the Internet questioning Obama's citizenship. The campaign then rushed to release the document, and the rush is responsible for the blacked-out certificate number. Says Shauna: "[We] couldn't get someone on the phone in Hawaii to tell us whether the number represented some secret information, and we erred on the side of blacking it out. Since then we've found out it's pretty irrelevant for the outside world." The document we looked at did have a certificate number; it is 151 1961 - 010641.


Blowup of certificate number

Some of the conspiracy theories that have circulated about Obama are quite imaginative. One conservative blogger suggested that the campaign might have obtained a valid Hawaii birth certificate, soaked it in solvent, then reprinted it with Obama's information. Of course, this anonymous blogger didn't have access to the actual document and presents this as just one possible "scenario" without any evidence that such a thing actually happened or is even feasible.

We also note that so far none of those questioning the authenticity of the document have produced a shred of evidence that the information on it is incorrect. Instead, some speculate that somehow, maybe, he was born in another country and doesn't meet the Constitution's requirement that the president be a "natural-born citizen."

We think our colleagues at PolitiFact.com, who also dug into some of these loopy theories put it pretty well: "It is possible that Obama conspired his way to the precipice of the world’s biggest job, involving a vast network of people and government agencies over decades of lies. Anything’s possible. But step back and look at the overwhelming evidence to the contrary and your sense of what’s reasonable has to take over."

In fact, the conspiracy would need to be even deeper than our colleagues realized. In late July, a researcher looking to dig up dirt on Obama instead found a birth announcement that had been published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961:


Obama's birth announcement


The announcement was posted by a pro-Hillary Clinton blogger who grudgingly concluded that Obama "likely" was born Aug. 4, 1961 in Honolulu.

Of course, it's distantly possible that Obama's grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday. We suggest that those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat. The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.

Update, August 26: We received responses to some of our questions from the Hawaii Department of Health. They couldn't tell us anything about their security paper, but they did answer another frequently-raised question: why is Obama's father's race listed as "African"? Kurt Tsue at the DOH told us that father's race and mother's race are supplied by the parents, and that "we accept what the parents self identify themselves to be." We consider it reasonable to believe that Barack Obama, Sr., would have thought of and reported himself as "African." It's certainly not the slam dunk some readers have made it out to be.

When we asked about the security borders, which look different from some other examples of Hawaii certifications of live birth, Kurt said "The borders are generated each time a certified copy is printed. A citation located on the bottom left hand corner of the certificate indicates which date the form was revised." He also confirmed that the information in the short form birth certificate is sufficient to prove citizenship for "all reasonable purposes."

by Jess Henig, with Joe Miller

.............................................................................................................................
What happen is some people started the rumor that Obama was not American and that His birth certificate was false, but this guys now proved that certificate is real, and that Obama was born in the United States.
I think that is acceptable for people to think that he is not American but not to say it like they sure of it.

Bank of America takes Merrill lynch

By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
Published: September 14, 2008
This article was reported by Jenny Anderson, Eric Dash and Andrew Ross Sorkin and was written by Mr. Sorkin.

In one of the most dramatic days in Wall Street’s history, Merrill Lynch agreed to sell itself on Sunday to Bank of America for roughly $50 billion to avert a deepening financial crisis, while another prominent securities firm, Lehman Brothers, filed for bankruptcy protection and hurtled toward liquidation after it failed to find a buyer.
The humbling moves, which reshape the landscape of American finance, mark the latest chapter in a tumultuous year in which once-proud financial institutions have been brought to their knees as a result of hundreds of billions of dollars in losses because of bad mortgage finance and real estate investments.
But even as the fates of Lehman and Merrill hung in the balance, another crisis loomed as the insurance giant American International Group appeared to teeter. Staggered by losses stemming from the credit crisis, A.I.G. sought a $40 billion lifeline from the Federal Reserve, without which the company may have only days to survive.
The stunning series of events culminated a weekend of frantic around-the-clock negotiations, as Wall Street bankers huddled in meetings at the behest of Bush administration officials to try to avoid a downward spiral in the markets stemming from a crisis of confidence.
“My goodness. I’ve been in the business 35 years, and these are the most extraordinary events I’ve ever seen,” said Peter G. Peterson, co-founder of the private equity firm the Blackstone Group, who was head of Lehman in the 1970s and a secretary of commerce in the Nixon administration.
It remains to be seen whether the sale of Merrill, which was worth more than $100 billion during the last year, and the controlled demise of Lehman will be enough to finally turn the tide in the yearlong financial crisis that has crippled Wall Street and threatened the broader economy.
Early Monday morning, Lehman said it would file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in New York for its holding company in what would be the largest failure of an investment bank since the collapse of Drexel Burnham Lambert 18 years ago, the Associated Press reported.
Questions remain about how the market will react Monday, particularly to Lehman’s plan to wind down its trading operations, and whether other companies, like A.I.G. and Washington Mutual, the nation’s largest savings and loan, might falter.
Indeed, in a move that echoed Wall Street’s rescue of a big hedge fund a decade ago this week, 10 major banks agreed to create an emergency fund of $70 billion to $100 billion that financial institutions can use to protect themselves from the fallout of Lehman’s failure.
The Fed, meantime, broadened the terms of its emergency loan program for Wall Street banks, a move that could ultimately put taxpayers’ money at risk.
Though the government took control of the troubled mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac only a week ago, investors have become increasingly nervous about whether major financial institutions can recover from their losses.
How things play out could affect the broader economy, which has been weakening steadily as the financial crisis has deepened over the last year, with unemployment increasing as the nation’s growth rate has slowed.
What will happen to Merrill’s 60,000 employees or Lehman’s 25,000 employees remains unclear. Worried about the unfolding crisis and its potential impact on New York City’s economy, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg canceled a trip to California to meet with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Instead, aides said, Mr. Bloomberg spent much of the weekend working the phones, talking to federal officials and bank executives in an effort to gauge the severity of the crisis.
The weekend that humbled Lehman and Merrill Lynch and rewarded Bank of America, based in Charlotte, N.C., began at 6 p.m. Friday in the first of a series of emergency meetings at the Federal Reserve building in Lower Manhattan.
The meeting was called by Fed officials, with Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. in attendance, and it included top bankers. The Treasury and Federal Reserve had already stepped in on several occasions to rescue the financial system, forcing a shotgun marriage between Bear Stearns and JPMorgan Chase this year and backstopping $29 billion worth of troubled assets — and then agreeing to bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The bankers were told that the government would not bail out Lehman and that it was up to Wall Street to solve its problems. Lehman’s stock tumbled sharply last week as concerns about its financial condition grew and other firms started to pull back from doing business with it, threatening its viability.
Without government backing, Lehman began trying to find a buyer, focusing on Barclays, the big British bank, and Bank of America. At the same time, other Wall Street executives grew more concerned about their own precarious situation.
The fates of Merrill Lynch and Lehman Brothers would not seem to be linked; Merrill has the nation’s largest brokerage force and its name is known in towns across America, while Lehman’s main customers are big institutions. But during the credit boom both firms piled into risky real estate and ended up severely weakened, with inadequate capital and toxic assets.
Knowing that investors were worried about Merrill, John A. Thain, its chief executive and an alumnus of Goldman Sachs and the New York Stock Exchange, and Kenneth D. Lewis, Bank of America’s chief executive, began negotiations. One person briefed on the negotiations said Bank of America had approached Merrill earlier in the summer but Mr. Thain had rebuffed the offer. Now, prompted by the reality that a Lehman bankruptcy would ripple through Wall Street and further cripple Merrill Lynch, the two parties proceeded with discussions.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/business/15lehman.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

...........................................................................
In my opinion the government should'n help the banks because they have to learn their lesson, and if they do it now , in the future the other banks will be smart and they won't do what this bank have been doing.plus if they do give them the money they need we will have to barrow money from China or another country and i think we have enough of that.
kaory